To the Editor of the Journal of Psychological Medicine

My dear Sir,—In the current number of your Journal (October, 1854) there is an article on Non-mechanical Restraint in the Treatment of the Insane, in which I am classified with those ” Medical Superintendents of Asylums who do not use restraint, but who give no opinion on the abstract question.” Will you permit me to say that this is not the exact position I wish or ought to occupy, for I direct mechanical restraint (suitable to the case) to be used when- ever, after a careful consideration of all the circumstances, it appears to me the best for the patient. Practically, I think I differ little, if at all, from the great majority of medical superintendents in the abstract opinion; for seclusion, immersion in the cold bath, the cold shower bath, and various other methods used to secure a control of the actions of the insane arc all based upon the principle of a coercive treatment being necessary in at least some cases, yet to be used as seldom as possible. In my reply to the queries of the Commis- sioners, I do not refer to those less direct methods of restraint, but only to the mechanical; and I remarked, “As to the use of persons or mechanical appli- ances, when physical force is absolutely necessary (and such cases must inevi- tably occur) my experience is in favour of the latter.”

Ail the means and methods used to regulate the actions of the insane, whether they be simply medicinal, or mechanical, or moral (as seclusion, the cold douche, &c.), may be used with unnecessary frequency, harshness, or cruelty; the ob- jections which apply to one, apply indeed to all. I, for one, therefore, should be glad to see a controversy terminated which has become useless for practical results, and appears not only to be degenerating into personalities, but to pre- sent a taint of empiricism. I am, my dear Sir, very truly yours, York, 13th Nov. 1854. J. Laycock.

Disclaimer

The historical material in this project falls into one of three categories for clearances and permissions:

  1. Material currently under copyright, made available with a Creative Commons license chosen by the publisher.

  2. Material that is in the public domain

  3. Material identified by the Welcome Trust as an Orphan Work, made available with a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

While we are in the process of adding metadata to the articles, please check the article at its original source for specific copyrights.

See https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/about/scanning/