Lunacy In Scotland
298 Art. VII.?
Tiie twentieth Annual Report of the Commissioners in Lunacy for Scotland has just appeared. It contains a great deal of valuable information respecting the present state of lunacy in the country.
The entire number of insane persons in Scotland on 1st January 1878, exclusive of unreported lunatics maintained in private dwellings from private sources, was 9,097. Of these 4,218 were males, 4,879 females; 1,569 were maintained from private sources, 7,473 by parochial rates, and 55 at the expense of the State.
From an examination of the number and distribution of the insane during the past year, as compared with previous years, some interesting conclusions are drawn.
” The broader and more important facts which these figures disclose are as follows:?(1) There has been during the past year no increase of the number of private lunatics; (2) there has been a considerable increase of the number of pauper lunatics ; (3) the population df private asylums has not increased in an appreciable degree ; (4) no pauper lunatic is now pro- vided for in a private asylum ; (5) there has been no indication of an increasing tendency to place patients in the lunatic wards of poorhouses; and (6) there has been a falling off in the num- ber of pauper patients provided for in private dwellings, but an increase of the number of private patients provided for in that manner.
” Some of these facts are of considerable significance and importance ; such, for instance, as the fact that pauper lunacy ?that is, lunacy among persons who become chargeable to parochial funds?appears to be increasing at a rate out of all proportion to the rate at which lunacy is increasing among those persons who are independent of parochial assistance, pro- vided that we assume the numbers of private and pauper patients respectively registered to be a true indication of the actual amounts. This raises a question as to whether some influence may not be at work leading parochial authorities to admit, with less hesitation than formerly, the existence of lunacy in appli- cants for relief. That the general operation of the lunacy laws has this effect we can scarcely doubt, and it may be regarded as certain that the special relation of the State to lunacy ‘which is involved in the relief of local taxation for the maintenance of the insane poor from imperial sources exerts an influence in the same direction.
” Perhaps the figures in lable I. disclose no fnct of greater interest than that all the pauper lunatics of Scotland, wlw) are placed in asylums, are now provided for in public institutions. We have no pauper patient in a private asylum. All lunatics supported by the public and in confinement, are now disposed of in establishments not merely under the supervision of the State, but also created and controlled by the public. It is no longei the interest of any private individual, eitliei to make a profit out of the low rate of board paid for them, 01 to pi olong their detention unnecessarily. This change in the way of prov iding for those of the pauper lunatics of Scotland who are held to require the restraints and appliances of asylums for their safe keeping and proper care, represents the complete accomplish- ment of one of the chief objects in view when the lunacy laws were amended in 1857. So far as we are aware, this particular end has not been so completely attained in any other country. Tables showing the ratio in which population, pauperism, and lunacy stand to each other are given. Ihese a es aie o great significance, and deserve to be carefully consi eiec. “Table IV. gives the ratio of lunatics, both pauper and private, to the general population in the yeai 185b, an a so in each of the ten years 1869-78* :?
Table IV. Years 18.58 18G9 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1870 1877 1878 Proportion per 100,000 of Population Of Lunatics in Establishments 131 170 177 179 180 182 184 188 193 200 20G Of Lunatics in Private Dwellings GO 46 45 45 4G 4G 44 42 42 43 42 Total Number of Lunatics 191 216 222 224 226 227 228 230 236 243 247
” The figures in this table are instructive and striking. It * Tbo population is taken .it the middle of each year, and tlic uumbor of lunatics at 1st January of each year. appears from them that there were 191 lunatics to 100,000 of the population in 1858, and that the proportion had risen in 1878 to 247. It appears, further, that during the last three years the increase has been exceptionally great. Fortunately, as we have already stated, it does not follow from these facts that the production of insanity in the community is greater than it formerly was, since the increase of the numbers on our regis- ters may perhaps be mainly due to a growing disposition to place the insane in establishments, and to the readiness to bring - under the jurisdiction of the Board, as lunatics, persons whose insanity is not strongly marked.”
” The increase of the number of registered lunatics which has taken place in Scotland will be more correctly appreciated if it is contrasted with the corresponding increase which has taken place in England.
” During the twelve years 1866-77, the proportion of regis- tered lunatics, private and pauper, has risen in Scotland from 206 per 100,000 of the population to 243. In England the proportion has risen during the same period from 222 to 271. ” If we confine the comparison to paupers, the results are even more striking. Thus?In Scotland the proportion of pauper lunatics to 100,000 of the population in 1866 was 171, and in 1877 it had risen to 202. In England, again, the pro- portion, which was 194 in 1866, had risen in 1877 to 240. In other words, during the period in question, the increase per 100,000 of the population was 31 in Scotland and 46 in Eng- land.
” The whole number of pauper lunatics rose in England from 31,782 in 1859 to 59,039 in 1877 ; and in Scotland, during the same period, it rose from 4,980 to 7,191. If the Scotch increase had been in the same ratio as the English, the pauper lunatics of Scotland in 1877 would have been 9,251 instead of 7,191. On the other hand, if the English increase had been in the same ratio as the Scotch, the pauper lunatics of England in 1877 would have been 45,892 instead of 59,039.
” The proportion of private lunatics to population is larger in Scotland than in England. Thus, in Scotland there were, on 1st January 1877, 1,461 private lunatics, and in England, on the same day, 7,597 ; and these numbers give for Scotland 43 in 100,000 of the population, and for England 31. In the rate of increase, the two countries do not show so great a difference as is seen in the case of paupers. The growth of registered private patients in England has been from 4,980 in 1859 to 7,597 in 1877, and in Scotland from 1,035 to 1,461.”
_” Table V., which follows, shows the relations between popu- lation and pauper lunacy and pauperism, and between pauperism and pauper lunacy:?
Table V. Tears 1801 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 Proportion per 100,000.* Of Registered Paupers to Population 2,555 2,430 2,376 2,309 2,199 2,085 1,976 1,958 1,861 1,813 1,727 Of Pauper Lunatics to Population 171 181 186 187 187 189 189 191 196 202 207 Of Pauper Lunatics to Paupers 6,800 7.489 7,714 7,928 8,189 8,657 9.127 9.734 10,527 11,138 11,965
” These figures show that the proportion of persons receiving parochial relief on account of lunacy to those who receive relief for every reason has risen from 68 per 1,000 in 1861 to 119 per 1,000 in 1878.
” They also show that while there has been, during the same period, a large decrease in the proportion of ordinary paupers to population, a large increase has taken place in the proportion of lunatic paupers to population. They show further, when examined in connection with Table IV., that the ratio of increase among private and among pauper patients for the period in question is as 20 to 36.”
Touching the apparent increase in lunacy, some pertinent observations are made. Two causes are assigned for this increase : a change in opinion as to what constitutes lunacy ; and the Government grant. We will quote the report on the subject:? ” In former reports we have endeavoured to show that there are no conclusive grounds for the opinion that there is an increased production of insanity in the country. There are satisfactory ways of accounting for much, if not for all, of the increase of the number of persons placed upon our registers as lunatics, or admitted into our asylums, without assuming any greater frequency in the occurrence of mental derangement. It may be held as certain that the whole of the increase is not due to a greater production of insanity, and it is possible that no part of it is thus accounted for. In so far as regards private patients, the increase may be accepted as not in excess of what is due to the growth of the population. Perhaps we should rather conclude that the figures indicate a decrease, when we bear in mind the change which has undoubtedly taken place in the views of medical men and of the public as to what con- stitutes lunacy, and especially as to what constitutes that degree and kind of lunacy which can be certified to render the subject of it a fit and proper person for care and treatment in an asylum.
” The operation of the change of opinion here referred to appears to have shown itself more strongly in the case of pauper lunatics, since the inducements to avoid having recourse to the costlier forms of treatment were weakened by the relief given to local taxation from imperial sources. During late years we have frequently had occasion to inquire into the necessity for placing persons on the roll of lunatics whose mental unsoundness was slight, and who had previously been ordinary paupers. From one parish, for instance, we received on one day intimations of five new cases of pauper lunacy. The population of that parish is only 2,460, and the greatest number of lunatics ever before on its poor roll was 6. The five lunatics referred to had long been ordinary paupers, and our investiga- tions showed that they were all of weak or unsound mind; but they, at the same time, left us in little doubt that these persons would have continued to be classed as ordinary paupers, if declaring them to be lunatics had not become a means of obtaining a contribution from Government towards their main- tenance. It is a fact which should not be lost sight of, that certificates of lunacy are seldom granted without a consideration of the social as well as the medical circumstances of each patient. In many cases the medical circumstances permit of either one view or the other being taken, and the consideration of the social circumstances then settles the question. From that consideration, the source of the money to be expended on the patient cannot reasonably be expected to be absent. It is a mistake to suppose that the certification of lunacy depends solely on whether a person’s mental condition shows a departure from some uniform and fixed standard of mental soundness which medical men have adopted. It is a mistake of equal importance to suppose that, in regard to those persons who are certified to be lunatics, their own well-being and happiness alone determine whether they shall be kept in asylums or left at freedom ; in a large number of instances the question is mainly determined by considerations affecting the convenience and comfort of others. We point to these facts here because it is necessary to bear them in mind when we investigate the nature of what is apt to be hastily regarded as indicating an increased production of lunacy in the country, and not because we think that such considerations should be excluded, nor because we think that the taking of them into account arises from an in- difference to the well-being of the insane.”
This growing tendency to place upon the list of pauper lunatics persons labouring under the less pronounced forms of insanity is commented upon by Dr Sibbald also one of the Deputy-Commissioners. He thinks that such patients are on the whole more fitly dealt with as single patients in private dwellings than as inmates of an asylum. He says: ” There must always, however, be a considerable number of cases of what may be called imperfect sanity, where the local authorities must be left to treat the individuals either as sane or insane, according as they may believe or choose.
” The effect of placing under the jurisdiction of the Board a greater number of persons of this kind, whose condition is at least on the border-land of sanity, is perhaps on the whole attended with advantage to the public; but it perceptibly adds to the difficulties of lunacy administration. It is, I believe, consistent with the experience of all who have been engaged in the treatment of lunatics either in or out of asylums, that the most troublesome cases are generally found among the least insane. If not strictly supervised, many persons in this condi- tion are exceptionally prone to the various forms of mischief- making and to breaches of public order or morality, while their seeming intelligence and capacity for good behaviour render those under whose charge they are placed not only unwilling to impose severe restrictions on their liberty, but doubtful of their right to do so. In view of these considerations, it sometimes becomes a question whether a degree of control sufficient to pre- vent misconduct can be exercised in a private dwelling over an individual who would be regarded by many as in a state not justifying any persistent restriction of his liberty. If the person is to be treated as insane, strict supervision will be necessary to prevent risk of disorder or misconduct, and probably such supervision can only be obtained in an asylum. If he is not to be regarded as insane, he is left absolutely free from supervision until, perhaps, some flagrant breach of order or some other misbehaviour brings him either to the prison or the asylum. Having now had an opportunity of considering many of such cases, I have come to the opinion that when they have been legally placed under the jurisdiction of the Board by the local authorities, it is proper in a large number of cases to sanc- tion the residence of the patients in private dwellings, even though the supervision to which they are thus subject must be in some respects imperfect. In a large proportion it is found practically to be sufficient, and it would not be justifiable to confine all such persons within the walls of asylums on account of the comparatively exceptional cases of failure.”
It may not be amiss to give in full’ the conclusions arrived with regard to voluntary patients. Voluntary patients are not registered as lunatics, their names and other particulars regarding them being entered in a special register.
” The number of voluntary patients admitted into asylums in 1877 was 51. The corresponding numbers in 1875 and 1876 were respectively 50 and 45. Their whole number on 1st January 1878 in the asylums of Scotland was 34. ” In our last Report we gave a series of tabular statements founded on our whole experience, which were intended to show the practical working of those provisions of the law which allow persons to enter asylums voluntarily. We recapitulate here the principal facts which these statements disclosed:?
” 1. When the provisions for the admission of voluntary patients were simplified* a very considerable increase of their number took place.
” 2. Many more men than women submit themselves volun- tarily to treatment in asylums. ” 3. Almost all those who are admitted voluntarily into asylums are persons in easy if not in affluent circumstances. “4. Voluntary patients are distributed very unequally over the different asylums of the country; in some asylums no voluntary patients have ever been received, while in others they have been numerous.
” 5. A few persons become voluntary patients in consequence of labouring under mental depression or disorder which is not sufficiently pronounced to warrant certificates of lunacy. In such cases it is sometimes found that after admission a patient’s condition may so change as to render it desirable and proper that he should be certificated, and this step is sometimes taken at our instance, but generally at the instance of the medical superintendent of the asylum, without interference on our part, though with our knowledge.
” 6. Occasionally voluntary patients are persons who have been admitted into asylums as lunatics in the usual way under an order of the sheriff, and who have greatly improved, but do not desire to withdraw themselves from treatment. Such patients are occasionally discharged from the register of lunatics as recovered, but do not leave the asylum, preferring to remain in it as voluntary patients. It is thought that this arrangement is sometimes productive of benefit, the recovery being more satisfactorily confirmed when all discontent at compulsory detention has been removed.
“7. The great majority of voluntary patients are persons who place themselves under treatment in consequence of a habit of indulging to excess in alcoholic stimulants. “8. With reference to voluntary patients whose condition is due to a craving for intoxicants, we are not able to speak favourably of the results of treatment. - It is not within our knowledge that among such persons a cure has been effected in any instance.
” 9. This unfavourable result may be due to the short stay which is usually made by persons entering asylums voluntarily; 27*0 per cent, leave after a stay of less than one month, and 54*9 per cent, after a stay of less than three months. A few persons, however?not more than five or six in all?have re- mained for periods varying from nine to eleven years, and appear to have voluntarily chosen asylums as their home.” Not the least interesting are the statistics showing the ratio of recoveries among private and pauper patients.
” Of 100 patients discharged recovered during the ten years 18G8 to 1877, 20 were private and 80 pauper. The ratio of recoveries, therefore, among private and pauper patients is in tolerably close accordance with the ratio of admissions, which is as 22 to 78.
” The following statement shows the proportion of patients discharged as recovered during 1877 per cent, of the patients admitted, for the different classes of establishments, and for the two sexes. It shows also for the different classes of establish- ments the mean annual percentage of recoveries on admission for the ten years 1868-77 :?
Recoveries per cent, of Admissions For the Year Yearly Mean for the 1877 Ten Years 1868-77 M. F. m. P. In Royal and District Asylums . 36-4 45*1 37’1 42-0 ? Parochial Asylums . . ? 39-4 40-0 38-7 39*6 ,, Private Asylums . 34-l 55’6 34-7 35’2 ,, Lunatic Wards of Poorhousos . 18*6 18”0 9’8 9*3 ” The patients received into Parochial Asylums probably comprise a greater proportion of persons labouring under the ephemeral forms of insanity than is found among those received into public and private asylums. This appears to furnish the explanation of the fact that the number of patients discharged from parochial asylums after a short sojourn in them is greater than the number of such patients discharged from other asylums.”
The remarks respecting death-rate in asylums are also worthy of notice.
” The death-rate of asylums cannot properly be compared with the death-rate of the general community. In asylums there are no persons under the age of ten years, whereas more than one-fourth of the general population is under that age. This fact alone, even if the death-rate among children did not show a rate of progress very different from that of persons above the age of ten, renders it impossible to institute a true comparison between the mortality of asylums and that of the whole community. Accordingly we have prepared the follow- ing table which shows the rates at which patients of different ages die in asylums, and the rates at which persons of corre- sponding ages die in the general population.
” In the third column we give the proportions which the asylum death-rates at the different ages bear to the death-rates at corresponding ages in the general population.
Ages in Years From 10 to 15 15 ? 20 20 ? 25 25 ? 30 30 ? 35 35 ? 40 40 ? 45 45 ? 50 50 tj 55 55 ? 60 60 ? 65 65 ? 70 70 ? 75 75 ? 80 80 ? 90 90 ? 100
Mean Annual Mortality per cent, of Patients resident in Asylums at different ages 6-2 68 63 51 6-2 6-4 6-8 6-8 7-9 9-1 11-7 150 18-7 26-7 39-6 20-4
Mean Annual Mortality per cent, of the General Population at different ages ?58 ?79 ?99 105 1-09 1-29 1-33 1-66 1-97 2-47 3-32 4-72 6-91 10-89 20-63 38-41 Number of Deaths in Asylums to one death in the Population at different ages 10-7 8-6 6-4 4-9 5-7 5-0 51 4-1 4-0 3-7 3.5 3-2 2-7 2-5 1-9 0-5
” This table shows that the inmates of asylums at all the quinquennia between the ages of 10 and 50 die nearly at the same rate, though the quinquennium 25-30 may be regarded as exhibiting an exceptionably low death-rate.
” In the general population, on the other hand, the death- rates for all the quinquennia between 10 and 50 increase annually in geometrical progression; and the death-rate for the last quinquennium, 45-50, is about three times that of the quinquennium 10-15.
” After the age of 50, that is, when the working period of life is over, the death-rates in asylums for the different quinquen- nia rise from period to period by a considerable though irregular progress. As regards the general population, they also rise rapidly but in a steady geometrical progression.
“Dealing say with the quinquennium 10?15, the third column of the table shows that for every death per cent, yielded by persons in the general population whose age foils within that period, 10-7 deaths per cent, are yielded by the inmates of asylums whose age falls within the same period; and so in like manner with the other quinquennia. It will be seen that the figures in this column steadily fall?the asylum death-rate for the quinquennium 10-15 being 10i times the normal death- rate for that age in the general population, while the death- rate for the quinquennium 75-80 is only 2-i times the normal death-rate for that age.”
Another valuable table, the eighth of a series, exhibits the history of such patients as were admitted into the asylums ot Scotland in 1868, and had not previously been in Scotch asylums, unless they were so before the 1st January 1858, when registers were instituted.
Year ]8G8 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1870 1877 New Cases admitted 1,319 Progressive History of Patients first admitted into Asylums in 18GS Re-admitted during year 38 73 40 36 35 24 19 19 17 19 Twice Thrice Total Number of Re-admissions 38 83 40 42 39 26 23 21 19 19 305 209 51 38 26 23 15 16 13 10 97 70 23 25 13 15 11 9 4 6 107 94 60 4S 28 25 13 13 9 13 = 8-3 ? q a = w o 818 558 464 395 367 330 314 297 290 280
” Several important facts are disclosed by the figures of this table. Among those of most interest are the following :? It is shown (1) that a large proportion of the recoveries which take place among patients occur within the first two years after admission ; (2) that a great and sudden diminution in the number of recoveries takes place in the third year, and becomes greater and greater in the years which follow ; (3) that in the whole number of recoveries it must often happen that one patient appears over and over again; and (4) that the death- rate among the inmates of asylums diminishes with length of residence. The last of these facts must always be of value in attempts to explain the varying death-rate in different asylums. It appears from it that an asylum, with a population largely made up of patients who have been long under treatment, should have a lower death-rate than an asylum with a popula- lation largely consisting of recently admitted patients.” With regard to medication, it is a significant fact that stimulants and narcotics are less used than formerly. ” Stimulants appear to be decreasingly consumed in Scotch asylums. Perhaps this may be accounted for by the increased amount of exercise and occupation in the open air, the greater tranquillity and contentment of the patients, and the more careful consideration which is given to the preparation of the food and to the varying of the dietary. It is possible, how- ever, that the reduced consumption of stimulants may in part be attributed to a change in the opinion of medical men as to their value.
” Even more than in the case of stimulants, the use of nar- cotics appears to be diminishing. In some large asylums, sleep- ing draughts are rarely given. Increasing attention, however, is bestowed on all those arrangements which tend to secure sound and refreshing natural sleep. The beds, for instance, are much larger than they formerly were. They are provided with head and foot boards, and are furnished with thick hair mat- tresses, and with a feather pillow in addition to a hair bolster. Among other things, too, which are done with the view of pro- curing sound sleep, is the giving to the feeble a second evening meal, and sometimes also food during the night.”
Many other points of interest occur in the report, and to several of them we should be glad to direct the attention of our readers. We fear, however, that our analysis has already reached its just limits. We will content ourselves, therefore, with re- ferring to the report itself those who wish for more information.
Disclaimer
The historical material in this project falls into one of three categories for clearances and permissions:
Material currently under copyright, made available with a Creative Commons license chosen by the publisher.
Material that is in the public domain
Material identified by the Welcome Trust as an Orphan Work, made available with a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
While we are in the process of adding metadata to the articles, please check the article at its original source for specific copyrights.