The psychiatrists

Reference-type:

Journal Article

Record-number:

17120

Author:

Tarsh, Michael

Year:

1971

Title:

The Psychiatrists

Journal:

Mind and Mental Health Magazine

Volume:

1971

Issue:

Winter

Pages:

21-21

Date:

Winter

Short-title:

The Psychiatrists

Alternate Journal:

Mind Ment Health Mag

ISSN:

0300-8266

Accession-number:

PMC4997102

Notes:

PMC4997102[pmcid]

Name-of-database:

PMC

Language:

eng

Although written by a professor of politics, this book is about American psychiatrists and analysts. It describes two different ‘tribes’ of doctors: analysts, more highly selected, earning more money and seeing fewer patients, who are individually more important and more influential, and general practitioners, working in mental hospitals and centres and seemingly regarded as an inferior breed. Politically both Groups incline to the Left, but the analysts incline much further.

The most interesting parts of the book are the long verbatim extracts in which doctors discuss the difficulties of their work. There appears be a sense of guilt and disillusionment amongst the analysts, who seem to be generally under attack from those favouring physical treatments and behaviour therapy in the one hand and from egalitarian demands for a fairer distribution of psychiatric skills on the other.

The last chapter of the book discusses the future of American Psychiatry which appears to be working towards a system similar to that found in England; analysts

“scorning teachers and trainers and a larger number of general psychiatrists coming into the community. The rivalries between mental hospital and general hospital (mental health centre), already apparent in England, seem about to in the U.S.A. Fringe psychiatric methods-especially sensitivity training at the Esalen Institute”

are discussed in disproportionate detail.

As a whole the book is a revealing portrait of a very unsettled introverted profession, increasingly valued externally, but at the same time, increasingly divergent about the directions in which it wants to proceed.

Michael Tarsh

Disclaimer

The historical material in this project falls into one of three categories for clearances and permissions:

  1. Material currently under copyright, made available with a Creative Commons license chosen by the publisher.

  2. Material that is in the public domain

  3. Material identified by the Welcome Trust as an Orphan Work, made available with a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

While we are in the process of adding metadata to the articles, please check the article at its original source for specific copyrights.

See https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/about/scanning/